Arabs, Turks Attempt to Redefine Arab Uprisings, Political Trajectories

121

Turkish and Arab intellectuals discussed the uncertain political trajectories of post-revolution Arab states in a southeastern Turkish city on the border with Syria, a country that has put Turkey’s assertive foreign policy to a difficult test during the unrest that has been rocking the Middle East for nearly a year.

Despite many positive developments that took place during the Arab Spring, there is still the risk of older authoritarian regimes re-emerging under different names.

Excerpt from the 25th Abant Platform’s Final Declaration

The event was the 25th in a series of gatherings organized by Zirve University and the Abant Platform, yet this time participants found a rare opportunity to discuss political developments elsewhere and the possible role Turkey might have in this political turmoil.

Comprising largely Turkish intellectuals both from Turkey and from around the world, Arab and Western commentators, activists and professors also joined in during the three-day event. Discussions primarily centered on redefining the Arab Spring, ways to cushion the pain of the transition period in post-revolution Arab nations, and Turkey’s contribution to political developments participants hoped signaled the birth pangs of consolidated democracies.

Turkey’s foreign policy, reoriented after Turkey blasted Arab rulers for shrugging off demands for reforms by risking its hard-won relationships, won many accolades from participants and panelists, but they agreed that Turkey’s assertive foreign policy might do more harm than good.

“Turkey had a marginal leadership role during the Arab uprisings. It is definitely an influential power, but it shouldn’t lead,” Mehmet Ali Birand, a veteran Turkish journalist, told participants during the second leg of the event in Gaziantep, broadcast live by Turkish TV networks, including the state-run TRT Arabic.

Turkey exhibited flip-flops in its foreign policy during the early days of the uprisings, which many claim caught it off-guard, but it drastically shifted its position to the extent of asking Syria’s embattled President Bashar al-Assad to step down last week.

Syria represents Turkey’s success story in its journey toward cultivating good relations with Arab neighbors it has long ignored. Lifting visa requirements, forging alliances, and signing free-trade agreements have catapulted Turkey’s trade with Arab nations.

Unrest in these countries, among other consequences, put in jeopardy years of painstaking efforts to repair ties between Turkey and Arab countries. Despite claiming that it would not tolerate rulers killing their own people in response to demands for basic rights, observers assert that Turkey initially failed to walk the talk.

Ehud Toledano, a professor from Tel Aviv University, welcomed what he called Turkey’s more “realist and pragmatist” foreign policy, which he said shifted after Turkey realized it was on the wrong side of history in the early days of the uprisings in Arab countries. He added that Turkey has the advantage of better understanding the region because of its geographical and cultural proximity. Peter Bechtold, a former director of the Foreign Service Institute, said it is unfortunate and yet normal to observe that Turks and Arabs don’t know each other well.

In its uphill struggle to adequately deal with a crisis in Syria, Turkey exhibited several subtle indicators of its mounting impatience with Assad’s never-ceasing penchant for violence. It finally imposed its own mild set of sanctions last week, targeting only the Assad regime, in the hope that Assad will feel the noose tightening.

Participants and panelists during the conference largely warned that Syria is a tinderbox edging towards civil war, but limited Turkey’s capacity to offer a functioning solution to ending nine months of instability that have claimed at least 4,000 lives according to the latest UN estimates.

Birand and Ihsan Dagi, a professor from Middle East Technical University (ODTU), warned against copying the Turkish model in which the military tries to position itself within the political system, referring to the apparent resistance of Egypt’s ruling military council to give up its privileges in a new and democratic Egypt.

Pakinam Sharkawy, a professor at Cairo’s American University, dismissed claims that Egypt, or any other Arab nations that have toppled their decrepit leaders this year, could return to a political structure where the military is dominant. She said the Arab Spring hit everywhere to varying degrees, including Morocco, whose king endorsed sweeping reforms this year — a development Turkey officially welcomed.

Dagi claimed that Turkey did not try to export its model to other Arab countries, while Ihsan Yilmaz from Fatih University added that Arabs could learn from Turkey’s experience during their efforts to build new political institutions instead of copying the model.

Ersat Hurmuzlu, President Abdullah Gul’s Middle East adviser, officially confirmed that Turkey is not exporting any models but acknowledged that it is a source of inspiration in many ways and that Arabs are welcome to learn from Turkey’s experience. Dagi continued during a panel discussion by saying that Turkey’s Syria policy for years was valid and tried to integrate its southern neighbor — then an Iranian proxy with a leader close to being an international pariah — into the international community. “Turkey always pushed for reforms in Syria. What was wrong with Turkey’s Syria policy was that Turkey believed Assad and his circle could in fact reform,” Dagi explained.

Helene Flautre, co-chairwoman of the EU-Turkey Joint Parliamentary Committee, said in her speech during the conference’s Istanbul leg that while Europe could not realize what was happening in the Middle East, Turkey was touted as a model for Arab states. She praised the current government’s efforts to limit the military’s power in politics and welcomed Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan’s call for secular regimes during his Arab Spring tour in September. She was obviously referring to the dangers Arab countries face in their painful transitions.

Cengiz Candar from the Radikal daily argued that Turkey’s “zero problems with neighbors” foreign policy — designed to work only as long as the status quo is maintained — is falling apart and spoke extensively about disappointment over the direction of events in these uprisings as they become more violent.

The final day of the conference slowly drifted toward and focused on Israel, which participants accused of being the chief culprit and primary source of authoritarian tendencies in the region.

“I don’t understand why these [Arabs] who are fighting for freedom, democracy, rights for women and minorities are so obsessed with a little country like Israel,” Dror Zeevi from Israel’s Ben Gurion University said.

Yilmaz slammed Zeevi over the comment. “For God’s sake, everyone knows what Arabs have gone through in the region because of Israeli policies,” he said.

Abant Platform warns of resurgence of old regimes in Arab states

Participants in the Abant Platform have warned against the danger of a resurgence of old authoritarian elements in post-revolution Arab states, urging countries that have stayed relatively stable and calm to immediately enact sweeping reforms to avoid any violence and unrest.

Turkish, Arab, and Western intellectuals, wrapping up the three-day annual conference, issued a final declaration on Sunday to underline challenges the Arab nations face amid political turmoil that has failed to remain peaceful and put the political future of these countries in jeopardy.

“Despite many positive developments that took place during the Arab Spring, there is still the risk of older authoritarian regimes re-emerging under different names,” stated the declaration, which was approved following a heated debate.

It added that all actors involved in the unrest have to realize that the older authoritarian regimes would try to revive themselves and urged that the major goal should be to enable the institutionalization of democracies and to strengthen civil societies to remove remnants of toppled regimes.

The declaration also urged all Middle Eastern countries to adopt a more participatory and democratic constitution based on human rights and the rule of law.

Mahir Zeynalov, Gaziantep

View Photo Gallery

Final Declaration
Final Declaration
231-Final-Declaration.pdf
86.4 KiB
126 Downloads
Details